tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post592377871292773812..comments2008-03-02T13:50:44.934-06:00Comments on Hollywood Dump: New Commercial Promotes Domestic SpyingThe Judgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17388580630080108495noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post-14564350374558111722008-03-02T13:50:00.000-06:002008-03-02T13:50:00.000-06:00Wow..is right!And years ago we were worried about ...Wow..is right!And years ago we were worried about big brother...Susiehttp://soul-to-soul.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post-3569548887550461732008-03-02T05:24:00.000-06:002008-03-02T05:24:00.000-06:00Three things. First, the Protect America Act deal...Three things. First, the Protect America Act dealt with FOREIGN, not domestic surveillance. It came under FISA because many entirely foreign communications flow through servers physically located in the U.S. Second, Terrorists were a threat to the United States long before we invaded Iraq (remember 9-11) or even before Bush took office (The first WTC bombing, Khobar Towers, The bombing of the USS Cole etc.). Finally, the Constitution requires probable cause before a warrant may be issued. This is a war, not Law & Order. Foreign electronic surveillance has been responsible for stopping several terrorist attacks. Do we really want that surveillance limited?Michael McChesneyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18337260833731031053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post-56502752784986555932008-03-02T02:42:00.000-06:002008-03-02T02:42:00.000-06:00Crippled? Hardly. The current laws simply force a ...Crippled? Hardly. The current laws simply force a the government to obtain a warrant. They HAVE NOT expired.<BR/><BR/>No warrant no tap. If no warrant is needed - why not let the government search anyones property, person, records (*cough * Choicepoint) and computer at anytime...as any of us could be a terrorist.<BR/><BR/>Americans need to wake up and pay attention - the facts are never in a 30-second ad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post-74321918351046433832008-03-02T00:11:00.000-06:002008-03-02T00:11:00.000-06:00Iraq's "limited" support for terrorism prior to th...Iraq's "limited" support for terrorism prior to the US led invasion included harboring Abu Abbas, the notorious mastermind of the Achille Lauro hijacking (and murders) and Abu Nidal, leader of the Fatah Revolutionary Coucil. Sadam Husein was also a prime financial supporter of Palistinian suicide bombers--just to name a few. <BR/><BR/>I think is is reasonable to easedrop on suspected terrorists (who are oversees) even when they make contact with US citizens. How else are we supposed to stop their planning for attacks in the US?Johnhttp://www.myspace.com/johnadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post-67631995905806367832008-03-01T15:25:00.000-06:002008-03-01T15:25:00.000-06:00It's scary how they can try to justify anything th...It's scary how they can try to justify anything they want by putting their own little "spin" on it.Jannahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04827716404911856909noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post-44377503948747378012008-03-01T11:29:00.000-06:002008-03-01T11:29:00.000-06:00Wow.. That is just crazy. I support Homeland Saf...Wow.. That is just crazy. I support Homeland Safety, but domestic spying??? Come on now!!! lol..Wickedly Cool Beanhttp://www.wickedlycoolbean.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35051836.post-16407230899157988942008-03-01T00:58:00.000-06:002008-03-01T00:58:00.000-06:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com